The Myth of Settler Violence as a Means of Delegitimizing Israel
In recent years, the concept of “settler violence” has begun to seep into the discourse in Israel and around the world.
Another generously funded, carefully planned and well-organized campaign (following the one of genocide and starvation in Gaza) created a false perception of a widespread phenomenon of violence by settlers in Judea and Samaria against Arab residents in the area.
The campaign’s objective was to spread the perception to the point that it became common knowledge, an undisputed fact. The campaign was designed to imprint the idea that this was a widespread phenomenon, and that the violent behavior was that of an entire segment of the population, a community of violent, lawbreaking settlers.
The United Nations (UN) produced reports on “settler violence” through OCHA, where it claims to actively document and tally current incidents of nationalistic violence in Judea and Samaria, including East Jerusalem. This list includes 8,332 “incidents involving Israeli settlers and other Israeli civilians” that occurred in the West Bank or Israel (not in Gaza) between January 11, 2016, and April 30, 2023.
The database, rely on sources that suffer from severe credibility issues and lack synchronization between them and inflated picture. The database, for example, counts Palestinians who were injured or killed during or in response to attacks and terrorist acts they themselves initiated against Israeli civilians in Judea, Samaria, and the rest of the country, as victims of “settler violence.
• The UN database includes thousands of clearly non-violent incidents in its count of violent events. For example: Jewish visits to the Temple Mount, tourists visiting archaeological sites, infrastructure work carried out legally by the State of Israel itself, traffic accidents, and more.
• Some 20% of the incidents listed by the UN database did not occur in Jerusalem, not in Judea and Samaria, therefore unrelated to “settler violence.”
• Approximately 19% of the incidents documented involve general complaints such as “trespassing” that refer to Israeli tourists and hikers, which did not include assault or damage.
• About 1,000 of the incidents are based solely on a single source – the PA’s District Coordination and Liaison Office –presented as two separate sources when in fact it is only one.
• 16% refer to visits of Israelis to the Temple Mount, classed as “confrontations.”
• After filtering out thousands of irrelevant cases, only 833 incidents remain over a 7.5-year period - a mere 10% of the original list.
Summary. The narrative of “settler violence” does not fully reflect reality, but rather serves as a tool to advance political agendas both internationally and domestically. The data shows that the extent of violence perpetrated by Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria is significantly lower than that portrayed in the media, and that Palestinian violence is the primary cause of regional instability.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Too many media outlets eager for a balanced-sounding narrative, have turned disputed friction in a conflict zone into a one-sided morality play.
Let’s start with the data.
Regavim, that Israeli NGO the EU loves to sanction for telling uncomfortable truths, dug into the UN’s own database of over 6,000 alleged incidents from 2016 to early 2023. The result? Over 86% weren’t violent at all. No injuries, no assaults, just presence, disputes, or nonsense.
Take the Temple Mount. Every single Jewish visit, quiet, prayerful, often just tourists or families, gets logged as a “violent incident” simply because Jews dare show up at our most sacred site.
In some analyses, this alone accounted for nearly 20% of the tally. Exercising our rights under Israeli law at the site of our ancient Temples is “violence.” This isn’t reporting. It’s propaganda dressed up as statistics.
A traffic accident with an Israeli-plated car? Automatic “settler” fault, no questions asked. State road-building or fence construction for security? Counted as “encroachment.” These are systematic inclusions that pad the numbers, creating the illusion of a crisis.
I’ve read accounts of olive trees “cut by settlers” on land with disputed titles, sometimes after court rulings or mutual vandalism. Trash fires or minor property damage after a terror attack get upgraded to “arson campaigns.” Even Palestinians injured in clashes they started, rock-throwing that provokes a response, land in the settler violence column.
Don’t get me wrong. Real violence by Jewish extremists – arson, assaults, the rare killing – happens. It’s indefensible, and those responsible should face justice. We don’t shy from that in our communities.
But among over 500,000 Jews in Judea and Samaria, these are fringe acts; statistically insignificant compared to the thousands of Palestinian terror attacks, stabbings, shootings, and car rammings we endure yearly.
Why does this distortion persist, even in outlets that write positively about Israel overall? Because it serves a purpose. It allows critics to say, “We support Israel’s right to exist, but…”
It balances coverage of Hamas atrocities with supposed Jewish moral equivalence. It feeds the international community’s discomfort with Jews living, thriving, and claiming our biblical heartland. Presence itself becomes a crime. A Jew building a home, hiking ancient paths, or defending his family is reframed as systematic oppression.
The outrage is selective. Daily Palestinian attempts, three to six terror incidents a day in the West Bank, barely register. But a bit of graffiti or a temporary roadblock after a murder result in global headlines.
The “settler violence” myth isn’t just sloppy journalism; it’s a deliberate blurring that equates routine friction in disputed territory, where both sides have claims, history, and grievances, with unprovoked terror. It ignores the fact that much of the tension stems from Palestinian rejection of Jewish legitimacy anywhere, let alone here in Judea and Samaria.
--adapted from an article by Aliza Pilichowsky, a certified interfaith hospice chaplain in Jerusalem and the mayor of Mitzpe Yeriho.
Another generously funded, carefully planned and well-organized campaign (following the one of genocide and starvation in Gaza) created a false perception of a widespread phenomenon of violence by settlers in Judea and Samaria against Arab residents in the area.
The campaign’s objective was to spread the perception to the point that it became common knowledge, an undisputed fact. The campaign was designed to imprint the idea that this was a widespread phenomenon, and that the violent behavior was that of an entire segment of the population, a community of violent, lawbreaking settlers.
The United Nations (UN) produced reports on “settler violence” through OCHA, where it claims to actively document and tally current incidents of nationalistic violence in Judea and Samaria, including East Jerusalem. This list includes 8,332 “incidents involving Israeli settlers and other Israeli civilians” that occurred in the West Bank or Israel (not in Gaza) between January 11, 2016, and April 30, 2023.
The database, rely on sources that suffer from severe credibility issues and lack synchronization between them and inflated picture. The database, for example, counts Palestinians who were injured or killed during or in response to attacks and terrorist acts they themselves initiated against Israeli civilians in Judea, Samaria, and the rest of the country, as victims of “settler violence.
• The UN database includes thousands of clearly non-violent incidents in its count of violent events. For example: Jewish visits to the Temple Mount, tourists visiting archaeological sites, infrastructure work carried out legally by the State of Israel itself, traffic accidents, and more.
• Some 20% of the incidents listed by the UN database did not occur in Jerusalem, not in Judea and Samaria, therefore unrelated to “settler violence.”
• Approximately 19% of the incidents documented involve general complaints such as “trespassing” that refer to Israeli tourists and hikers, which did not include assault or damage.
• About 1,000 of the incidents are based solely on a single source – the PA’s District Coordination and Liaison Office –presented as two separate sources when in fact it is only one.
• 16% refer to visits of Israelis to the Temple Mount, classed as “confrontations.”
• After filtering out thousands of irrelevant cases, only 833 incidents remain over a 7.5-year period - a mere 10% of the original list.
Summary. The narrative of “settler violence” does not fully reflect reality, but rather serves as a tool to advance political agendas both internationally and domestically. The data shows that the extent of violence perpetrated by Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria is significantly lower than that portrayed in the media, and that Palestinian violence is the primary cause of regional instability.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Too many media outlets eager for a balanced-sounding narrative, have turned disputed friction in a conflict zone into a one-sided morality play.
Let’s start with the data.
Regavim, that Israeli NGO the EU loves to sanction for telling uncomfortable truths, dug into the UN’s own database of over 6,000 alleged incidents from 2016 to early 2023. The result? Over 86% weren’t violent at all. No injuries, no assaults, just presence, disputes, or nonsense.
Take the Temple Mount. Every single Jewish visit, quiet, prayerful, often just tourists or families, gets logged as a “violent incident” simply because Jews dare show up at our most sacred site.
In some analyses, this alone accounted for nearly 20% of the tally. Exercising our rights under Israeli law at the site of our ancient Temples is “violence.” This isn’t reporting. It’s propaganda dressed up as statistics.
A traffic accident with an Israeli-plated car? Automatic “settler” fault, no questions asked. State road-building or fence construction for security? Counted as “encroachment.” These are systematic inclusions that pad the numbers, creating the illusion of a crisis.
I’ve read accounts of olive trees “cut by settlers” on land with disputed titles, sometimes after court rulings or mutual vandalism. Trash fires or minor property damage after a terror attack get upgraded to “arson campaigns.” Even Palestinians injured in clashes they started, rock-throwing that provokes a response, land in the settler violence column.
Don’t get me wrong. Real violence by Jewish extremists – arson, assaults, the rare killing – happens. It’s indefensible, and those responsible should face justice. We don’t shy from that in our communities.
But among over 500,000 Jews in Judea and Samaria, these are fringe acts; statistically insignificant compared to the thousands of Palestinian terror attacks, stabbings, shootings, and car rammings we endure yearly.
Why does this distortion persist, even in outlets that write positively about Israel overall? Because it serves a purpose. It allows critics to say, “We support Israel’s right to exist, but…”
It balances coverage of Hamas atrocities with supposed Jewish moral equivalence. It feeds the international community’s discomfort with Jews living, thriving, and claiming our biblical heartland. Presence itself becomes a crime. A Jew building a home, hiking ancient paths, or defending his family is reframed as systematic oppression.
The outrage is selective. Daily Palestinian attempts, three to six terror incidents a day in the West Bank, barely register. But a bit of graffiti or a temporary roadblock after a murder result in global headlines.
The “settler violence” myth isn’t just sloppy journalism; it’s a deliberate blurring that equates routine friction in disputed territory, where both sides have claims, history, and grievances, with unprovoked terror. It ignores the fact that much of the tension stems from Palestinian rejection of Jewish legitimacy anywhere, let alone here in Judea and Samaria.
--adapted from an article by Aliza Pilichowsky, a certified interfaith hospice chaplain in Jerusalem and the mayor of Mitzpe Yeriho.
